quarta-feira, 16 de julho de 2014
sexta-feira, 27 de junho de 2014
anarquistas e o estado
A conveniência das manipulações semânticas e investigações teóricas na linha de Hayek conseguem por anarquistas contra o próprio estado social, contra a contribuição sob a forma de impostos e contra o sufrágio universal (a própria cura apontada por Marx contra os malefícios da coerção dos estados não socialistas/proletários). Penso que é a mesma linha de Nozick e Reeves. Nuances semânticas que tornam qualquer bem intencionado num potêncial anarco-capitalista, ou pior, num passivo apaniguador do neo-liberalismo reinante.
Achei interessante a este propósito esta postura de
Focault acerca da questão do Estado
>>>> Michel Foucault believed that modern political theory was too state-centric, saying "Maybe, after all, the state is no more than a composite reality and a mythologized abstraction, whose importance is a lot more limited than many of us think." He thought that political theory was focusing too much on abstract institutions, and not enough on the actual practices of government.
In Foucault's opinion, the state had no essence.
He believed that instead of trying to understand the activities of governments by analyzing the properties of the state (a reified abstraction), political theorists should be examining changes in the practice of government to understand changes in the nature of the state (...)
>>>> Michel Foucault believed that modern political theory was too state-centric, saying "Maybe, after all, the state is no more than a composite reality and a mythologized abstraction, whose importance is a lot more limited than many of us think." He thought that political theory was focusing too much on abstract institutions, and not enough on the actual practices of government.
In Foucault's opinion, the state had no essence.
He believed that instead of trying to understand the activities of governments by analyzing the properties of the state (a reified abstraction), political theorists should be examining changes in the practice of government to understand changes in the nature of the state (...)
Foucault acerca do Estado
Michel Foucault believed that modern political theory was too state-centric, saying "Maybe, after all, the state is no more than a composite reality and a mythologized abstraction, whose importance is a lot more limited than many of us think." He thought that political theory was focusing too much on abstract institutions, and not enough on the actual practices of government. In Foucault's opinion, the state had no essence. He believed that instead of trying to understand the activities of governments by analyzing the properties of the state (a reified abstraction), political theorists should be examining changes in the practice of government to understand changes in the nature of the state
Subscrever:
Comentários (Atom)